Title |
Concentric division of 10° visual field tests in retinitis pigmentosa
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10384-013-0235-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ken Ogino, Atsushi Otani, Akio Oishi, Masafumi Kurimoto, Takuro Sekiya, Nagahisa Yoshimura |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to estimate the optimal size of visual field test for detecting longitudinal changes in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by dividing the visual field. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,184,694
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#340
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,542
of 192,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.