| Title |
Six principles for managing forests as ecologically sustainable ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10980-012-9720-9 |
| Authors |
David B. Lindenmayer, Saul A. Cunningham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 190 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 90 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,721,979
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#445
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,877
of 156,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.