↓ Skip to main content

The Kids are All Right? Income Inequality and Civic Engagement among Our Nation’s Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
The Kids are All Right? Income Inequality and Civic Engagement among Our Nation’s Youth
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10964-016-0557-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin B. Godfrey, Hua-Yu Sebastian Cherng

Abstract

Prior work suggests that income inequality depresses civic participation among adults. However, associations between income inequality and youth civic engagement have not been assessed. This is true despite evidence that other features of communities influence youth civic development. To fill the gap, we examine associations between county-level income inequality and civic engagement among a nationally representative sample of 12,240 15-year-olds (50 % female). We find opposite patterns than those suggested by the adult literature. Higher county-level income inequality is associated with slightly more civic engagement (greater importance of helping others, higher rates of volunteering often), and this is particularly true for low-socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic minority youth. Potential developmental and structural explanations for these differences are offered. In addition, practical implications of these findings are drawn, and future research directions for scholars studying youth are proposed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Professor 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 36%
Psychology 27 25%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#439,145
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#71
of 1,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,681
of 344,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.