↓ Skip to main content

Family History of Colorectal Cancer in BRAF p.V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family History of Colorectal Cancer in BRAF p.V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer Cases
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2013
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel D. Buchanan, Aung K. Win, Michael D. Walsh, Rhiannon J. Walters, Mark Clendenning, Belinda Nagler, Sally-Ann Pearson, Finlay A. Macrae, Susan Parry, Julie Arnold, Ingrid Winship, Graham G. Giles, Noralane M. Lindor, John D. Potter, John L. Hopper, Christophe Rosty, Joanne P. Young, Mark A. Jenkins

Abstract

Previous reports suggest that relatives of colorectal cancer (CRC)-affected probands carrying the BRAF p.V600E mutation are at an increased risk of CRC and extracolonic cancers (ECC). In this study, we estimated the association between a family history of either CRC or ECC and risk of CRC with a BRAF p.V600E mutation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Librarian 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,289,516
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#948
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,116
of 205,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#25
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.