You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a phase 1 pilot trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62188-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nir Lipsman, D Blake Woodside, Peter Giacobbe, Clement Hamani, Jacqueline C Carter, Sarah Jane Norwood, Kalam Sutandar, Randy Staab, Gavin Elias, Christopher H Lyman, Gwenn S Smith, Andres M Lozano |
| Abstract |
Anorexia nervosa is characterised by a chronic course that is refractory to treatment in many patients and has one of the highest mortality rates of any psychiatric disorder. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been applied to circuit-based neuropsychiatric diseases, such as Parkinson's disease and major depression, with promising results. We aimed to assess the safety of DBS to modulate the activity of limbic circuits and to examine how this might affect the clinical features of anorexia nervosa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 13% |
| France | 5 | 5% |
| Ireland | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 22% |
| Scientists | 6 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 432 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 15% |
| Researcher | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 103 | 23% |
| Unknown | 87 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 35% |
| Psychology | 61 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 42 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 107 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 330. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#103,034
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,453
of 43,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#539
of 208,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#10
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.