| Title |
Facilitating adaptation of biodiversity to climate change: a conceptual framework applied to the world’s largest Mediterranean-climate woodland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-011-0092-y |
| Authors |
Suzanne M. Prober, Kevin R. Thiele, Philip W. Rundel, Colin J. Yates, Sandra L. Berry, Margaret Byrne, Les Christidis, Carl R. Gosper, Pauline F. Grierson, Kristina Lemson, Tom Lyons, Craig Macfarlane, Michael H. O’Connor, John K. Scott, Rachel J. Standish, William D. Stock, Eddie J. B. van Etten, Grant W. Wardell-Johnson, Alexander Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 75 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,266,489
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#707
of 5,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,459
of 115,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#14
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.