↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun Garg, Kurt T Hegmann, J Steven Moore, Jay Kapellusch, Matthew S Thiese, Sruthi Boda, Parag Bhoyr, Donald Bloswick, Andrew Merryweather, Richard Sesek, Gwen Deckow-Schaefer, James Foster, Eric Wood, Xiaoming Sheng, Richard Holubkov, The BackWorks Study Team

Abstract

Few prospective cohort studies of workplace low back pain (LBP) with quantified job physical exposure have been performed. There are few prospective epidemiological studies for LBP occupational risk factors and reported data generally have few adjustments for many personal and psychosocial factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 14%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Engineering 12 9%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,559,172
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,180
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,264
of 196,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#46
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.