↓ Skip to main content

Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?
Published in
Neuroethics, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12152-012-9158-4
Authors

Colin J. Palmer, Bryan Paton, Trung T. Ngo, Richard H. Thomson, Jakob Hohwy, Steven M. Miller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 43%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2013.
All research outputs
#4,169,235
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,586
of 161,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.