↓ Skip to main content

Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
Title
Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10816-011-9102-7
Authors

Philip Verhagen, Thomas G. Whitley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 3%
United States 7 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 283 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 24%
Student > Master 53 17%
Researcher 48 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 47 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 109 35%
Social Sciences 79 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 7%
Environmental Science 11 4%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#175
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,277
of 188,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them