↓ Skip to main content

P. falciparum In Vitro Killing Rates Allow to Discriminate between Different Antimalarial Mode-of-Action

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
P. falciparum In Vitro Killing Rates Allow to Discriminate between Different Antimalarial Mode-of-Action
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura M. Sanz, Benigno Crespo, Cristina De-Cózar, Xavier C. Ding, Jose L. Llergo, Jeremy N. Burrows, Jose F. García-Bustos, Francisco-Javier Gamo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 206 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 19%
Student > Master 27 13%
Other 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 35 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 23%
Chemistry 36 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,765,421
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,378
of 195,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,865
of 156,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#962
of 3,531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.