You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Histology-Related Associations of ERCC1, RRM1, and TS Biomarkers in Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1097/jto.0b013e318287c3c5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin K.H. Maus, Philip C. Mack, Stephanie H. Astrow, Craig L. Stephens, Gary D. Zeger, Peter P. Grimminger, Jack H. Hsiang, Eric Huang, Tianhong Li, Primo N. Lara, Kathleen D. Danenberg, David R. Gandara |
| Abstract |
On the basis of the results of recent clinical trials, histology-based decision-making for therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer has been advocated. We hypothesized associations of the biomarkers excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1), and thymidylate synthase (TS) with histology as a contributing factor to reported differences in chemotherapy outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) and adenocarcinoma (AC) subtypes. Here, we report analysis of the Response Genetics Inc., database and implications for histology-based therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Romania | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,621,966
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#275
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,906
of 204,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#4
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.