Title |
Validation of a questionnaire for assessing fecal impaction in the elderly: impact of cognitive impairment, and using a proxy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-24 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marta Barcelo, Maria Jose Jimenez-Cebrian, Manuel Diaz-Rubio, Alberto Lopez Rocha, Enrique Rey |
Abstract |
Studies on the epidemiology of fecal impaction are limited by the absence of a valid and reliable instrument to identify the condition in the elderly. Our aim is to validate a questionnaire for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly and to assess the impact of cognitive impairment and the aid of a proxy on its reliability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
Psychology | 5 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2013.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#3,045
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,765
of 197,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.