| Title |
What Are They Really Eating? A Review on New Approaches to Dietary Intake Assessment and Validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Nutrition Reports, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13668-016-0182-6 |
| Authors |
Megan E. Rollo, Rebecca L. Williams, Tracy Burrows, Sharon I. Kirkpatrick, Tamara Bucher, Clare E. Collins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,025,288
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#128
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,719
of 319,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.