| Title |
Research Frontiers in Ecosystem Service Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-016-0049-0 |
| Authors |
Elena M. Bennett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 20 | 23% |
| United States | 16 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 60% |
| Scientists | 31 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 22% |
| Researcher | 54 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 92 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 71 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2017.
All research outputs
#861,281
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#46
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,093
of 325,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.