↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in developing countries: systematic review, meta-analysis and public policy implications

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Global Health Journal, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 3,781)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1129 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
7 Redditors
bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in developing countries: systematic review, meta-analysis and public policy implications
Published in
BMJ Global Health Journal, May 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 257 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Master 17 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 145 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 152 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 889. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#24,861
of 34,552,530 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#18
of 3,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#729
of 469,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#5
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,552,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.