↓ Skip to main content

Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Neurology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1753 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1515 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study
Published in
Lancet Neurology, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70044-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor L Villemagne, Samantha Burnham, Pierrick Bourgeat, Belinda Brown, Kathryn A Ellis, Olivier Salvado, Cassandra Szoeke, S Lance Macaulay, Ralph Martins, Paul Maruff, David Ames, Christopher C Rowe, Colin L Masters, for the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Research Group

Abstract

Similar to most chronic diseases, Alzheimer's disease (AD) develops slowly from a preclinical phase into a fully expressed clinical syndrome. We aimed to use longitudinal data to calculate the rates of amyloid β (Aβ) deposition, cerebral atrophy, and cognitive decline. In this prospective cohort study, healthy controls, patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with AD were assessed at enrolment and every 18 months. At every visit, participants underwent neuropsychological examination, MRI, and a carbon-11-labelled Pittsburgh compound B ((11)C-PiB) PET scan. We included participants with three or more (11)C-PiB PET follow-up assessments. Aβ burden was expressed as (11)C-PiB standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR) with the cerebellar cortex as reference region. An SUVR of 1·5 was used to discriminate high from low Aβ burdens. The slope of the regression plots over 3-5 years was used to estimate rates of change for Aβ deposition, MRI volumetrics, and cognition. We included those participants with a positive rate of Aβ deposition to calculate the trajectory of each variable over time. 200 participants (145 healthy controls, 36 participants with MCI, and 19 participants with AD) were assessed at enrolment and every 18 months for a mean follow-up of 3·8 (95% CI CI 3·6-3·9) years. At baseline, significantly higher Aβ burdens were noted in patients with AD (2·27, SD 0·43) and those with MCI (1·94, 0·64) than in healthy controls (1·38, 0·39). At follow-up, 163 (82%) of the 200 participants showed positive rates of Aβ accumulation. Aβ deposition was estimated to take 19·2 (95% CI 16·8-22·5) years in an almost linear fashion-with a mean increase of 0·043 (95% CI 0·037-0·049) SUVR per year-to go from the threshold of (11)C-PiB positivity (1·5 SUVR) to the levels observed in AD. It was estimated to take 12·0 (95% CI 10·1-14·9) years from the levels observed in healthy controls with low Aβ deposition (1·2 [SD 0·1] SUVR) to the threshold of (11)C-PiB positivity. As AD progressed, the rate of Aβ deposition slowed towards a plateau. Our projections suggest a prolonged preclinical phase of AD in which Aβ deposition reaches our threshold of positivity at 17·0 (95% CI 14·9-19·9) years, hippocampal atrophy at 4·2 (3·6-5·1) years, and memory impairment at 3·3 (2·5-4·5) years before the onset of dementia (clinical dementia rating score 1). Aβ deposition is slow and protracted, likely to extend for more than two decades. Such predictions of the rate of preclinical changes and the onset of the clinical phase of AD will facilitate the design and timing of therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying the course of this illness. Science and Industry Endowment Fund (Australia), The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia), The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Program and Project Grants, the Austin Hospital Medical Research Foundation, Victorian State Government, The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, and the Alzheimer's Association.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1472 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 292 19%
Researcher 217 14%
Student > Bachelor 169 11%
Student > Master 163 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 85 6%
Other 216 14%
Unknown 373 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 253 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 227 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 10%
Psychology 105 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 102 7%
Other 246 16%
Unknown 437 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#292,123
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#187
of 4,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,850
of 212,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.