↓ Skip to main content

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetes
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11892-016-0811-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Lee, Richard Rosen

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is a progressive microvascular disease that leads to increased vessel permeability, retinal ischemia, and retinal neovascularization. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a novel angiography technique that has the capability to advance our understanding of diabetic eye disease by providing high-resolution images of retinal and choroidal microvasculature blood flow and structure. Using OCTA, the vascular changes of diabetic retinopathy including microaneurysms, retinal non-perfusion, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities, and neovascularization can be clearly visualized. OCTA offers several advantages over fluorescein angiography (FA) in that it is faster, safer, and non-invasive, allows better visualization of retinal vessels in both the superficial and deep capillary layers, and can provide quantitative measurements of areas of non-perfusion of the macula and nerve. OCTA capillary perfusion density maps and average perfusion density values provide an easy way to grade progressive vascular change. Despite these advantages, imaging with OCTA can only provide a limited view of the peripheral retina and is unable to demonstrate leakage, staining, or pooling. OCTA requires patients to maintain good fixation to obtain high-resolution images which can be a challenge for those with severe macular disease. In patients who cannot safely undergo FA, OCTA may serve as an alternative form of angiography that can be safely and more frequently performed for the management of diabetic retinopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 16 12%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 51%
Engineering 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,478,448
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#771
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,921
of 315,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.