You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy: A descriptive analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic Disease, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.03.08 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven Leong, Hong Ju, Henry Marshall, Rayleen Bowman, Ian Yang, Ann-Maree Ree, Cathy Saxon, Kwun M Fong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 25% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 36% |
| Engineering | 25 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Disease
#702
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,828
of 173,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Disease
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.