↓ Skip to main content

A statistical approach to detection of copy number variations in PCR-enriched targeted sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
A statistical approach to detection of copy number variations in PCR-enriched targeted sequencing data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1272-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

German Demidov, Tamara Simakova, Julia Vnuchkova, Anton Bragin

Abstract

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a common enrichment technique for targeted massive parallel sequencing (MPS) protocols. MPS is widely used in biomedical research and clinical diagnostics as the fast and accurate tool for the detection of short genetic variations. However, identification of larger variations such as structure variants and copy number variations (CNV) is still being a challenge for targeted MPS. Some approaches and tools for structural variants detection were proposed, but they have limitations and often require datasets of certain type, size and expected number of amplicons affected by CNVs. In the paper, we describe novel algorithm for high-resolution germinal CNV detection in the PCR-enriched targeted sequencing data and present accompanying tool. We have developed a machine learning algorithm for the detection of large duplications and deletions in the targeted sequencing data generated with PCR-based enrichment step. We have performed verification studies and established the algorithm's sensitivity and specificity. We have compared developed tool with other available methods applicable for the described data and revealed its higher performance. We showed that our method has high specificity and sensitivity for high-resolution copy number detection in targeted sequencing data using large cohort of samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Computer Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,583,658
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,238
of 7,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,818
of 323,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#28
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.