↓ Skip to main content

Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00265-009-0874-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian R. Johnson

Abstract

Honeybees exhibit two patterns of organization of work. In the spring and summer, division of labor is used to maximize growth rate and resource accumulation, while during the winter, worker survivorship through the poor season is paramount, and bees become generalists. This work proposes new organismal and proximate level conceptual models for these phenomena. The first half of the paper presents a push-pull model for temporal polyethism. Members of the nursing caste are proposed to be pushed from their caste by the development of workers behind them in the temporal caste sequence, while middle-aged bees are pulled from their caste via interactions with the caste ahead of them. The model is, hence, an amalgamation of previous models, in particular, the social inhibition and foraging for work models. The second half of the paper presents a model for the proximate basis of temporal polyethism. Temporal castes exhibit specialized physiology and switch caste when it is adaptive at the colony level. The model proposes that caste-specific physiology is dependent on mutually reinforcing positive feedback mechanisms that lock a bee into a particular behavioral phase. Releasing mechanisms that relate colony level information are then hypothesized to disrupt particular components of the priming mechanisms to trigger endocrinological cascades that lead to the next temporal caste. Priming and releasing mechanisms for the nursing caste are mapped out that are consistent with current experimental results. Less information-rich, but plausible, mechanisms for the middle-aged and foraging castes are also presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 1%
United States 4 1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 353 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 19%
Researcher 58 16%
Student > Master 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 54 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 4%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 60 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 8%
Computer Science 13 4%
Environmental Science 10 3%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 73 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,719,796
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#303
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,245
of 95,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.