↓ Skip to main content

Mental Health Communications Skills Training for Medical Assistants in Pediatric Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Mental Health Communications Skills Training for Medical Assistants in Pediatric Primary Care
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11414-012-9292-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Brown, Lawrence S. Wissow, Benjamin L. Cook, Shaina Longway, Emily Caffery, Chris Pefaure

Abstract

Paraprofessional medical assistants (MAs) could help to promote pediatric primary care as a source of mental health services, particularly among patient populations who receive disparate mental health care. This project piloted a brief training to enhance the ability of MAs to have therapeutic encounters with Latino families who have mental health concerns in pediatric primary care. The evaluation of the pilot found that MAs were able to master most of the skills taught during the training, which improved their ability to have patient-centered encounters with families during standardized patient visits coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Parents interviewed 1 and 6 months following the training were more than twice as willing as parents interviewed 1 month before the training to discuss mental health concerns with MAs, and they had better perceptions of their interactions with MAs (all p < 0.01) even after controlling for a range of patient and visit characteristics. Before training, 10.2% of parents discussed a mental health concern with the MA but not the physician; this never happened 6 months after training. This pilot provides preliminary evidence that training MAs holds potential to supplement other educational and organizational interventions aimed at improving mental health services in pediatric primary care, but further research is necessary to test this type of training in other settings and among different patient populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 18%
Social Sciences 20 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 37 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#358
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,090
of 176,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.