↓ Skip to main content

Association of Suboptimal Health Status and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Urban Chinese Workers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Association of Suboptimal Health Status and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Urban Chinese Workers
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9636-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu X. Yan, Jing Dong, You Q. Liu, Xing H. Yang, Man Li, Gilbert Shia, Wei Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#733
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,756
of 244,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.