↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoid Receptor 2: Potential Role in Immunomodulation and Neuroinflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 602)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
Title
Cannabinoid Receptor 2: Potential Role in Immunomodulation and Neuroinflammation
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11481-013-9445-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Slava Rom, Yuri Persidsky

Abstract

An accumulating body of evidence suggests that endocannabinoids and cannabinoid receptors type 1 and 2 (CB(1), CB(2)) play a significant role in physiologic and pathologic processes, including cognitive and immune functions. While the addictive properties of marijuana, an extract from the Cannabis plant, are well recognized, there is growing appreciation of the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in multiple pathologic conditions involving chronic inflammation (inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, autoimmune disorders, multiple sclerosis, HIV-1 infection, stroke, Alzheimer's disease to name a few), mainly mediated by CB(2) activation. Development of CB(2) agonists as therapeutic agents has been hampered by the complexity of their intracellular signaling, relative paucity of highly selective compounds and insufficient data regarding end effects in the target cells and organs. This review attempts to summarize recent advances in studies of CB(2) activation in the setting of neuroinflammation, immunomodulation and HIV-1 infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 321 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 83 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 33 10%
Psychology 27 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 7%
Other 69 21%
Unknown 95 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#725,002
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#21
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,811
of 209,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.