↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Association of Cadherin Expression and Histopathologic Type, Metastasis, or Patient Outcome in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Tissue Microarray Study

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Lack of Association of Cadherin Expression and Histopathologic Type, Metastasis, or Patient Outcome in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Tissue Microarray Study
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12105-011-0306-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. C. Ukpo, W. L. Thorstad, Q. Zhang, J. S. Lewis

Abstract

Altered cadherin expression is important for metastasis in many carcinomas including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We evaluated E- and N-cadherin expression specifically in oropharyngeal SCC and correlated this with clinical and pathologic features. Oropharyngeal SCC patients with clinical follow up information were identified from clinician databases from 1996 through 2007 and tissue microarrays created. Tumors had been previously typed histopathologically as keratinizing, non-keratinizing, or non-keratinizing with maturation, and had known p16 and human papillomavirus status, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the microarrays, and staining was evaluated for presence and intensity (0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = moderate, 3 = strong) both visually and also with digital image analysis software. Of 154 cases, E-cadherin was expressed in 152 (98.7%) and N-cadherin in 17 (11.5%). Neither E- nor N-cadherin expression was statistically significantly associated with histopathologic type (P = 0.082 and P = 0.228, respectively). E-cadherin staining intensity was not statistically significantly associated with nodal or distant metastasis, either visually or by image analysis, (P = 0.098 and P = 0.963 respectively) nor was N-cadherin (P = 0.228 and P = 0.935 respectively). Neither E- nor N-cadherin expression was associated with death from disease (P = 0.995; P = 0.964, respectively). E-cadherin is extensively expressed by oropharyngeal SCC, even the non-keratinizing type. Our results suggest that cadherin expression may not be a predictor for nodal or distant metastasis in these tumors. Mechanisms independent of cadherin expression may be important for metastases in oropharyngeal SCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,266,089
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#760
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,054
of 142,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.