↓ Skip to main content

Myelin repair and functional recovery mediated by neural cell transplantation in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Bulletin, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Myelin repair and functional recovery mediated by neural cell transplantation in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis
Published in
Neuroscience Bulletin, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12264-013-1312-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianhua Bai, Jordan Hecker, Amber Kerstetter, Robert H. Miller

Abstract

Cellular therapies are becoming a major focus for the treatment of demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), therefore it is important to identify the most effective cell types that promote myelin repair. Several components contribute to the relative benefits of specific cell types including the overall efficacy of the cell therapy, the reproducibility of treatment, the mechanisms of action of distinct cell types and the ease of isolation and generation of therapeutic populations. A range of distinct cell populations promote functional recovery in animal models of MS including neural stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissues. Each of these cell populations has advantages and disadvantages and likely works through distinct mechanisms. The relevance of such mechanisms to myelin repair in the adult central nervous system is unclear since the therapeutic cells are generally derived from developing animals. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of a population of neural cells from the adult spinal cord that are characterized by the expression of the cell surface glycoprotein NG2. In functional studies, injection of adult NG2(+) cells into mice with ongoing MOG35-55-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) enhanced remyelination in the CNS while the number of CD3(+) T cells in areas of spinal cord demyelination was reduced approximately three-fold. In vivo studies indicated that in EAE, NG2(+) cells stimulated endogenous repair while in vitro they responded to signals in areas of induced inflammation by differentiating into oligodendrocytes. These results suggested that adult NG2(+) cells represent a useful cell population for promoting neural repair in a variety of different conditions including demyelinating diseases such as MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Neuroscience 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Bulletin
#486
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,601
of 195,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Bulletin
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.