↓ Skip to main content

Racial differences in the response of cardiorespiratory fitness to aerobic exercise training in Caucasian and African American postmenopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racial differences in the response of cardiorespiratory fitness to aerobic exercise training in Caucasian and African American postmenopausal women
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01077.2012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damon L. Swift, Neil M. Johannsen, Carl J. Lavie, Conrad P. Earnest, William D. Johnson, Steven N. Blair, Timothy S. Church, Robert L. Newton

Abstract

African American (AA) women have an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and have been reported to have lower cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) compared with Caucasian American (CA) women. However, little data exist that evaluate racial differences in the change in CRF following aerobic exercise training. CA (n = 264) and AA (n = 122) postmenopausal women from the Dose-Response to Exercise in Women study were randomized to 4, 8, and 12 kcal·kg body wt(-1)·wk(-13) (KKW) of aerobic training or the control group for 6 mo. CRF was evaluated using a cycle ergometer. A greater increase in relative CRF was observed in CA compared with AA women in the 4 (CA: 1.00 vs. AA: 0.35 ml O2·kg(-1)·min (-1), P = 0.034), 8 (CA: 1.59 vs. AA: 0.82 ml O2·kg(-1)·min (-1), P = 0.041), and 12 (CA: 1.98 vs. AA: 0.50 ml O2·kg(-1)·min (-1), P = 0.001) KKW groups. Similar effects were found in absolute CRF, with the exception of the 4-KKW (CA: 0.04 vs. AA: 0.02 l O2/min, P = 0.147) group. However, in categorical analyses, the percentages of women who improved in both relative (>0 ml O2·kg(-1)·min (-1)) and absolute (>0 l O2/min) CRF were not significantly different for CA and AA women in all exercise groups (all P > 0.05). AA postmenopausal women, in general, had an attenuated increase in CRF (both relative and absolute) following exercise training, but had similar response rates compared with CA women. Future studies should investigate the physiologic mechanisms responsible for this attenuated response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#7,491
of 9,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,056
of 207,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#52
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.