| Title |
Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Technology Transfer, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10961-016-9470-y |
| Authors |
Christopher S. Hayter, Roman Lubynsky, Spiro Maroulis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 295 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 80 | 27% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 25 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Engineering | 21 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 90 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,435,326
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#14
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,706
of 300,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.