↓ Skip to main content

Size characterization of airborne SiO2 nanoparticles with on-line and off-line measurement techniques: an interlaboratory comparison study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Size characterization of airborne SiO2 nanoparticles with on-line and off-line measurement techniques: an interlaboratory comparison study
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11051-013-1919-4
Authors

C. Motzkus, T. Macé, F. Gaie-Levrel, S. Ducourtieux, A. Delvallee, K. Dirscherl, V.-D. Hodoroaba, I. Popov, O. Popov, I. Kuselman, K. Takahata, K. Ehara, P. Ausset, M. Maillé, N. Michielsen, S. Bondiguel, F. Gensdarmes, L. Morawska, G. R. Johnson, E. M. Faghihi, C. S. Kim, Y. H. Kim, M. C. Chu, J. A. Guardado, A. Salas, G. Capannelli, C. Costa, T. Bostrom, Å. K. Jämting, M. A. Lawn, L. Adlem, S. Vaslin-Reimann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 14%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Chemistry 4 11%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Materials Science 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,414
of 197,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.