↓ Skip to main content

A Consensus Statement Addressing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis: It’s Time!

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
A Consensus Statement Addressing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis: It’s Time!
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12015-010-9173-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Siatskas, Natalie L. Payne, Martin A. Short, Claude C. A. Bernard

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system that is characterized by inflammation, demyelination with associated accumulation of myelin debris, oligodendrocyte and axonal loss. Current therapeutic interventions for multiple sclerosis predominantly modulate the immune system and reduce the inflammatory insult by general, non-specific mechanisms but have little effect on the neurodegenerative component of the disease. Predictably, the overall long-term impact of treatment is limited since the neurodegenerative component of the disease, which can be the dominant process in some patients, determines permanent disability. Mesenchymal stem cells, which are endowed with potent immune regulatory and neuroprotective properties, have recently emerged as promising cellular vehicles for the treatment of MS. Preclinical evaluation in experimental models of MS have shown that MSCs are efficacious in suppressing clinical disease. Mechanisms that may underlie these effects predominantly involve the secretion of immunomodulatory and neurotrophic growth factors, which collectively act to limit CNS inflammation, stimulate neurogenesis, protect axons and promote remyelination. As a logical progression to clinical utility, the safety of these cells have been initially assessed in hematological, cardiac and inflammatory diseases. Importantly, transplantation with autologous or allogeneic MSCs has been well tolerated by patients with few significant adverse effects. On the basis of these results, new, multicentre clinical trials have been launched to assess the safety and efficacy of MSCs for inflammatory MS. It thus comes as no surprise that the coalescence of an international group of experts have convened to generate a consensus guide for the transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived MSC which, in time, may set the foundation for the next generation of therapies for the treatment of MS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#821
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,403
of 103,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.