| Title |
Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: the Difference One Word Can Make
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Heritage, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Marc N. Elliott, Megan Beckett, Michael Wilkes |
| Abstract |
In primary, acute-care visits, patients frequently present with more than 1 concern. Various visit factors prevent additional concerns from being articulated and addressed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 31% |
| Australia | 11 | 18% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 39% |
| Scientists | 23 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 18% |
| Researcher | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 87 | 26% |
| Unknown | 50 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 69 | 21% |
| Linguistics | 44 | 13% |
| Psychology | 27 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#594,411
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#470
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#848
of 78,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.