↓ Skip to main content

The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing
Published in
Osteoporosis International, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00198-016-3773-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. C. Harvey, E. Biver, J.-M. Kaufman, J. Bauer, J. Branco, M. L. Brandi, O. Bruyère, V. Coxam, A. Cruz-Jentoft, E. Czerwinski, H. Dimai, P. Fardellone, F. Landi, J.-Y. Reginster, B. Dawson-Hughes, J. A. Kanis, R. Rizzoli, C. Cooper

Abstract

The place of calcium supplementation, with or without concomitant vitamin D supplementation, has been much debated in terms of both efficacy and safety. There have been numerous trials and meta-analyses of supplementation for fracture reduction, and associations with risk of myocardial infarction have been suggested in recent years. In this report, the product of an expert consensus meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Foundation for Osteoporosis (IOF), we review the evidence for the value of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D supplementation, for healthy musculoskeletal ageing. We conclude that (1) calcium and vitamin D supplementation leads to a modest reduction in fracture risk, although population-level intervention has not been shown to be an effective public health strategy; (2) supplementation with calcium alone for fracture reduction is not supported by the literature; (3) side effects of calcium supplementation include renal stones and gastrointestinal symptoms; (4) vitamin D supplementation, rather than calcium supplementation, may reduce falls risk; and (5) assertions of increased cardiovascular risk consequent to calcium supplementation are not convincingly supported by current evidence. In conclusion, we recommend, on the basis of the current evidence, that calcium supplementation, with concomitant vitamin D supplementation, is supported for patients at high risk of calcium and vitamin D insufficiency, and in those who are receiving treatment for osteoporosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Professor 10 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 72 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 77 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#919,352
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#106
of 3,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,078
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.