↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge of Breast Density and Awareness of Related Breast Cancer Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Knowledge of Breast Density and Awareness of Related Breast Cancer Risk
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13187-013-0457-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Manning, Neb Duric, Peter Littrup, Lisa Bey-Knight, Louis Penner, Terrance L. Albrecht

Abstract

Little is known about women's knowledge of breast density or between-race differences in this knowledge. In the current study, we examined knowledge of breast density and awareness of its role as a breast cancer risk factor among women who had previously taken part in a breast imaging study. Seventy-seven women (54.5 % Black) returned a survey assessing perceptions and accuracy of breast density knowledge, knowledge of one's own breast density, and breast cancer risk awareness. White women had greater perceived knowledge of breast density compared to Black women; however, differences in the accuracy of definitions of breast density were due to education. Black women were less likely to know how dense their own breasts were. Black and White women both lacked awareness that having dense breast increased breast cancer risk. The results highlight the need to disseminate information regarding breast density to women, while ensuring that the information is equally accessible to both Black and White women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,266,089
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#602
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,457
of 194,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.