↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Verbal Threat Information in the Development of Childhood Fear. “Beware the Jabberwock!”

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 376)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Role of Verbal Threat Information in the Development of Childhood Fear. “Beware the Jabberwock!”
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10567-010-0064-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Muris, Andy P. Field

Abstract

Rachman's (Behaviour Research and Therapy 15:372-387, 1977; Clinical Psychology Review 11:155-173, 1991) three pathways theory proposed that childhood fears not only arise as a consequence of direct learning experiences, but can also be elicited by means of threat information transmission. This review looks at the scientific evidence for this idea, which has accumulated during the past three decades. We review research on the influences of media exposure on children's fears, retrospective parent and child reports on the role of threat information in fear acquisition, and experimental studies that explored the causal effects of threat information on childhood fears. We also discuss possible mechanisms by which threat information exerts its influence and the processes relevant to understand the role of this type of learning experience in the origins of fear. Finally, implications for the prevention and intervention of childhood fears are briefly explored, and potential leads for future research will be highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#462,869
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#23
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,254
of 95,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them