↓ Skip to main content

Small bite, large impact–saliva and salivary molecules in the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Small bite, large impact–saliva and salivary molecules in the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis
Published in
The Science of Nature, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00114-011-0859-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan-Peter Hildebrandt, Sarah Lemke

Abstract

Blood-sucking leeches have been used for medical purposes in humans for hundreds of years. Accordingly, one of the most prominent species has been named Hirudo medicinalis by Carl Linne in 1758. Feeding on vertebrate blood poses some serious problems to blood-sucking ectoparasites, as they have to penetrate the body surface of the host and to suppress the normal reactions of the host to such injuries (swelling, pain, inflammation) to remain undetected during the feeding period. Furthermore, the parasites have to take measures to inhibit the normal reactions in host tissues to blood vessel damage, namely hemostasis and blood coagulation (platelet aggregation and activation, activation of thrombin and formation of fibrin clots). During evolution, leeches have acquired the ability to control these processes in their hosts by transferring various bioactive substances to the host. These substances are supposedly produced in unicellular salivary gland cells and injected into the wound at the feeding site through tiny salivary ductule openings in the jaws that the leech uses to slice open the host body surface and to cut blood vessels in the depth of the wound. This review summarizes current knowledge about the salivary gland cells and the biological effects of individual saliva components as well as hints to the potential usefulness of some of these compounds for medical purposes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 2 2%
Sri Lanka 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 81 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#1,978
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,517
of 145,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.