↓ Skip to main content

Rational Design of a Fibroblast Growth Factor 21-Based Clinical Candidate, LY2405319

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rational Design of a Fibroblast Growth Factor 21-Based Clinical Candidate, LY2405319
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexei Kharitonenkov, John M. Beals, Radmila Micanovic, Beth A. Strifler, Radhakrishnan Rathnachalam, Victor J. Wroblewski, Shun Li, Anja Koester, Amy M. Ford, Tamer Coskun, James D. Dunbar, Christine C. Cheng, Christopher C. Frye, Thomas F. Bumol, David E. Moller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Chemistry 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,517,069
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,102
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,663
of 212,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,396
of 5,490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.