↓ Skip to main content

High-intensity focused ultrasound tumor ablation: Review of ten years of clinical experience

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
High-intensity focused ultrasound tumor ablation: Review of ten years of clinical experience
Published in
Frontiers of Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11684-010-0092-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lian Zhang, Zhi-Biao Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Physics and Astronomy 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Medicine
#106
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,223
of 104,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them