You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.12082 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina M. Kennedy, Eric Lonsdorf, Maile C. Neel, Neal M. Williams, Taylor H. Ricketts, Rachael Winfree, Riccardo Bommarco, Claire Brittain, Alana L. Burley, Daniel Cariveau, Luísa G. Carvalheiro, Natacha P. Chacoff, Saul A. Cunningham, Bryan N. Danforth, Jan‐Hendrik Dudenhöffer, Elizabeth Elle, Hannah R. Gaines, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Claudio Gratton, Andrea Holzschuh, Rufus Isaacs, Steven K. Javorek, Shalene Jha, Alexandra M. Klein, Kristin Krewenka, Yael Mandelik, Margaret M. Mayfield, Lora Morandin, Lisa A. Neame, Mark Otieno, Mia Park, Simon G. Potts, Maj Rundlöf, Agustin Saez, Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter, Hisatomo Taki, Blandina Felipe Viana, Catrin Westphal, Julianna K. Wilson, Sarah S. Greenleaf, Claire Kremen |
| Abstract |
Bees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both by local farm management and the surrounding landscape. To better understand these different factors, we modelled the relative effects of landscape composition (nesting and floral resources within foraging distances), landscape configuration (patch shape, interpatch connectivity and habitat aggregation) and farm management (organic vs. conventional and local-scale field diversity), and their interactions, on wild bee abundance and richness for 39 crop systems globally. Bee abundance and richness were higher in diversified and organic fields and in landscapes comprising more high-quality habitats; bee richness on conventional fields with low diversity benefited most from high-quality surrounding land cover. Landscape configuration effects were weak. Bee responses varied slightly by biome. Our synthesis reveals that pollinator persistence will depend on both the maintenance of high-quality habitats around farms and on local management practices that may offset impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 39% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 76% |
| Scientists | 8 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 1% |
| Brazil | 12 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1681 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 310 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 310 | 18% |
| Researcher | 293 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 205 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 83 | 5% |
| Other | 264 | 15% |
| Unknown | 301 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 865 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 351 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 1% |
| Engineering | 18 | 1% |
| Other | 97 | 5% |
| Unknown | 392 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#760,184
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#376
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,102
of 210,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.