↓ Skip to main content

Impaired duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation in functional dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impaired duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation in functional dyspepsia
Published in
Gut, March 2013
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Vanheel, Maria Vicario, Tim Vanuytsel, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Cristina Martinez, Åsa V Keita, Nicolas Pardon, Javier Santos, Johan D Söderholm, Jan Tack, Ricard Farré

Abstract

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is an extremely common functional gastrointestinal disorder, the pathophysiology of which is poorly understood. We hypothesised that impaired intestinal barrier function is involved in the onset and persistence of this disorder by inducing low-grade inflammation. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation in patients with FD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 188 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 60 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,081,342
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#1,701
of 7,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,656
of 209,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#14
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.