↓ Skip to main content

Stepping Stones Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for children with disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stepping Stones Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for children with disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cassandra L. Tellegen, Matthew R. Sanders

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the treatment effects of a behavioral family intervention, Stepping Stones Triple P (SSTP) for parents of children with disabilities. SSTP is a system of five intervention levels of increasing intensity and narrowing population reach. Twelve studies, including a total of 659 families, met eligibility criteria. Studies needed to have evaluated SSTP, be written in English or German, contribute original data, and have sufficient data for analyses. No restrictions were placed on study design. A series of meta-analyses were performed for seven different outcome categories. Analyses were conducted on the combination of all four levels of SSTP for which evidence exists (Levels 2-5), and were also conducted separately for each level of SSTP. Significant moderate effect sizes were found for all levels of SSTP for reducing child problems, the primary outcome of interest. On secondary outcomes, significant overall effect sizes were found for parenting styles, parenting satisfaction and efficacy, parental adjustment, parental relationship, and observed child behaviors. No significant treatment effects were found for observed parenting behaviors. Moderator analyses showed no significant differences in effect sizes across the levels of SSTP intervention, with the exception of child observations. Risk of bias within and across studies was assessed. Analyses suggested that publication bias and selective reporting bias were not likely to have heavily influenced the findings. The overall evidence base supported the effectiveness of SSTP as an intervention for improving child and parent outcomes in families of children with disabilities. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 19%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 38%
Social Sciences 37 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 50 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,864,139
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#234
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,223
of 207,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#5
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.