You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cardiology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B.E. Backus, A.J. Six, J.C. Kelder, M.A.R. Bosschaert, E.G. Mast, A. Mosterd, R.F. Veldkamp, A.J. Wardeh, R. Tio, R. Braam, S.H.J. Monnink, R. van Tooren, T.P. Mast, F. van den Akker, M.J.M. Cramer, J.M. Poldervaart, A.W. Hoes, P.A. Doevendans |
| Abstract |
The focus of the diagnostic process in chest pain patients at the emergency department is to identify both low and high risk patients for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The HEART score was designed to facilitate this process. This study is a prospective validation of the HEART score. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 36% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 429 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 11% |
| Researcher | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 11% |
| Other | 103 | 24% |
| Unknown | 90 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 278 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 103 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#508,963
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cardiology
#58
of 7,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,282
of 207,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cardiology
#2
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.