↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children: endemic or epidemic?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children: endemic or epidemic?
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00467-016-3509-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Dossier, Nathanael Lapidus, Florian Bayer, Anne-Laure Sellier-Leclerc, Olivia Boyer, Loic de Pontual, Adrien May, Sylvie Nathanson, Christine Orzechowski, Tabassome Simon, Fabrice Carrat, Georges Deschênes

Abstract

The etiology of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) remains partially unknown. Viral infections have been reported to be associated with INS onset and relapse. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of a population-based cohort of children with INS and propose a spatiotemporal analysis. All children aged 6 months to 15 years with INS onset between December 2007 and May 2010 and living in the Paris area were included in a prospective multicenter study. Demographic and clinical features at diagnosis and 2 years were collected. INS was diagnosed in 188 children, 93 % of whom were steroid sensitive. Annual incidence was 3.35/100,000 children. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was higher in one of the eight counties: Seine-Saint-Denis, with SIR 1.43 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.95]. A spatial cluster was further identified with higher SIR 1.36 (95 % CI 1.09-1.67). Temporal analysis within this overincidence area showed seasonal variation, with a peak during the winter period (p <0.01). In addition, partition of the Paris area into quintiles of the population showed that the average delay of occurrence, with regard to the first study case, followed a longitudinal progression (p <0.0001). The clustering of cases, the seasonal variation within this particular area, and the progression over the Paris area altogether suggest that INS may occur on an epidemic mode.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Other 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 25 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,909,693
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,014
of 3,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,711
of 313,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#27
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.