↓ Skip to main content

Serious Postoperative Complications Affect Early Recurrence After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Serious Postoperative Complications Affect Early Recurrence After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4297-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geert A. Simkens, Thijs R. van Oudheusden, Misha D. Luyer, Simon W. Nienhuijs, Grard A. Nieuwenhuijzen, Harm J. Rutten, Ignace H. de Hingh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Other 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 52%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,695,859
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,503
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,662
of 333,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#54
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.