↓ Skip to main content

Beyond borders: on the influence of the creationist movement on the educational landscape in the USA and Russia

Overview of attention for article published in Theory in Biosciences, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 219)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Beyond borders: on the influence of the creationist movement on the educational landscape in the USA and Russia
Published in
Theory in Biosciences, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12064-016-0238-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Watts, Uwe Hossfeld, Irina Tolstikova, Georgy S. Levit

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed look at how creationism originated in the United States and then explores how this evangelical trend was exported to Russia by American missionaries following the fall of the USSR. The comparison between these two countries is particularly interesting since the rivalry between the US and the USSR during the race to space caused both countries to revamp their science education. Yet, while political interests led both governments to focus on science education, creationist activities were simultaneously focused on diminishing the coverage of evolution in science classrooms. Now, decades following Sputnik's trip to space, the urgency to strengthen scientific learning has waned, while creationists are still equally focused on removing scientific naturalism in favor of supernatural explanations for the origin of species. This paper thus offers an in-depth look at which groups are currently responsible for promoting creationist activities in the US and in Russia and which groups are working hard to keep supernatural doctrines out of science curriculum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 22%
Professor 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 44%
Social Sciences 2 22%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Mathematics 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,458,703
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#18
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,568
of 324,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them