↓ Skip to main content

Health behavior and college students: Does Greek affiliation matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Health behavior and college students: Does Greek affiliation matter?
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10865-007-9136-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. J. Scott-Sheldon, Kate B. Carey, Michael P. Carey

Abstract

The college years offer an opportunity for new experiences, personal freedom, and identity development; however, this period is also noted for the emergence of risky health behaviors that place college students at risk for health problems. Affiliation with on-campus organizations such as fraternities or sororities may increase a students' risk given the rituals and socially endorsed behaviors associated with Greek organizations. In this study, we examined alcohol and drug use, smoking, sexual behavior, eating, physical activity, and sleeping in 1,595 college students (n = 265 Greek members, n = 1,330 non-Greek members). Results show Greek members engaged in more risky health behaviors (e.g., alcohol use, cigarette smoking, sexual partners, and sex under the influence of alcohol or drugs) than non-Greek members. Greek and non-Greek members did not differ in condom use, unprotected sex, eating, and physical activity behaviors. Implications for prevention and intervention strategies among Greek members are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 30%
Social Sciences 27 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,249,595
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#112
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,540
of 76,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them