| Title |
Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Yes, if we choose to use it
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-011-2128-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanna Tuomisto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 10 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 281 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 72 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 177 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 71 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,121,759
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,266
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,232
of 133,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.