↓ Skip to main content

Reframing the Moral Limits of Markets Debate: Social Domains, Values, Allocation Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Reframing the Moral Limits of Markets Debate: Social Domains, Values, Allocation Methods
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3346-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Wempe, Jeff Frooman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 21 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,867,424
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,001
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,286
of 315,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.