| Title |
Critical success factors taxonomy for software process deployment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Software Quality Journal, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11219-012-9190-y |
| Authors |
Sussy Bayona-Oré, Jose A. Calvo-Manzano, Gonzalo Cuevas, Tomas San-Feliu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 45 | 46% |
| Engineering | 11 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Software Quality Journal
#33
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,271
of 293,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software Quality Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them