↓ Skip to main content

Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 42,993)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2
Published in
The Lancet, June 2022
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00941-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michela Antonelli, Joan Capdevila Pujol, Tim D Spector, Sebastien Ourselin, Claire J Steves

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,816 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Other 19 8%
Student > Master 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 114 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 125 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6928. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#428
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#45
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15
of 433,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.