You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Epidemiology, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ije/31.1.78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stacey A Missmer, Stephanie A Smith-Warner, Donna Spiegelman, Shiaw-Shyuan Yaun, Hans-Olov Adami, W Lawrence Beeson, Piet A van den Brandt, Gary E Fraser, Jo L Freudenheim, R Alexandra Goldbohm, Saxon Graham, Lawrence H Kushi, Anthony B Miller, John D Potter, Thomas E Rohan, Frank E Speizer, Paolo Toniolo, Walter C Willett, Alicja Wolk, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, David J Hunter |
| Abstract |
More than 20 studies have investigated the relation between meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer risk with conflicting results. Our objective was to evaluate the risk of breast cancer associated with meat and dairy food consumption and to assess whether non-dietary risk factors modify the relation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#577,143
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#257
of 5,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#637
of 132,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.