↓ Skip to main content

AIM‐1: An Antibiotic‐Degrading Metallohydrolase That Displays Mechanistic Flexibility

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AIM‐1: An Antibiotic‐Degrading Metallohydrolase That Displays Mechanistic Flexibility
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/chem.201602762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Selleck, James A. Larrabee, Jeffrey Harmer, Luke W. Guddat, Nataša Mitić, Waleed Helweh, David L. Ollis, Whitney R. Craig, David L. Tierney, Marcelo Monteiro Pedroso, Gerhard Schenk

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a major threat to global health care. This is largely due to the fact that many pathogens have developed strategies to acquire resistance to antibiotics. Metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) have evolved to inactivate most of the commonly used β-lactam antibiotics. AIM-1 is one of only a few MBLs from the B3 subgroup that is encoded on a mobile genetic element in a major human pathogen. Here, its mechanism of action was characterised with a combination of spectroscopic and kinetic techniques and compared to that of other MBLs. Unlike other MBLs it appears that AIM-1 has two avenues available for the turnover of the substrate nitrocefin, distinguished by the identity of the rate-limiting step. This observation may be relevant with respect to inhibitor design for this group of enzymes as it demonstrates that at least some MBLs are very flexible in terms of interactions with substrates and possibly inhibitors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Chemistry 4 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,158,869
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#13,126
of 22,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,429
of 319,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#153
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.